The reverse transcriptase domain of prime editors contributes to DNA repair in mammalian cells – Nature Biotechnology
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844 (2020).
Google Scholar
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kim, D. Y., Moon, S. B., Ko, J. H., Kim, Y. S. & Kim, D. Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 10576–10589 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liang, S. Q. et al. Genome-wide profiling of prime editor off-target sites in vitro and in vivo using PE-tag. Nat. Methods 20, 898–907 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jin, S. et al. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1292–1299 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gao, R. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of prime editing guide RNA-independent off-target effects by prime editors. CRISPR J. 5, 276–293 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fiumara, M. et al. Genotoxic effects of base and prime editing in human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 877–891 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bannert, N. & Kurth, R. Retroelements and the human genome: new perspectives on an old relation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14572–14579 (2004).
Google Scholar
Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Google Scholar
Kazazian, H. H. Jr & Moran, J. V. Mobile DNA in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 361–370 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wells, J. N. & Feschotte, C. A field guide to eukaryotic transposable elements. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 539–561 (2020).
Google Scholar
Moore, J. K. & Haber, J. E. Capture of retrotransposon DNA at the sites of chromosomal double-strand breaks. Nature 383, 644–646 (1996).
Google Scholar
Teng, S. C., Kim, B. & Gabriel, A. Retrotransposon reverse-transcriptase-mediated repair of chromosomal breaks. Nature 383, 641–644 (1996).
Google Scholar
Morrish, T. A. et al. DNA repair mediated by endonuclease-independent LINE-1 retrotransposition. Nat. Genet. 31, 159–165 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tao, J., Wang, Q., Mendez-Dorantes, C., Burns, K. H. & Chiarle, R. Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites. Nat. Commun. 13, 3685 (2022).
Google Scholar
Park, S. K., Mohr, G., Yao, J., Russell, R. & Lambowitz, A. M. Group II intron-like reverse transcriptases function in double-strand break repair. Cell 185, 3671–3688.e23 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. A split prime editor with untethered reverse transcriptase and circular RNA template. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1388–1393 (2022).
Google Scholar
Grunewald, J. et al. Engineered CRISPR prime editors with compact, untethered reverse transcriptases. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 337–343 (2023).
Google Scholar
van Overbeek, M. et al. DNA repair profiling reveals nonrandom outcomes at Cas9-mediated breaks. Mol. Cell 63, 633–646 (2016).
Google Scholar
Xue, C. & Greene, E. C. DNA repair pathway choices in CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing. Trends Genet. 37, 639–656 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shou, J., Li, J., Liu, Y. & Wu, Q. Precise and predictable CRISPR chromosomal rearrangements reveal principles of Cas9-mediated nucleotide insertion. Mol. Cell 71, 498–509 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. A versatile reporter system for CRISPR-mediated chromosomal rearrangements. Genome Biol. 16, 111 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ohtsubo, Y., Sasaki, H., Nagata, Y. & Tsuda, M. Optimization of single strand DNA incorporation reaction by Moloney murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase. DNA Res. 25, 477–487 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kaushik, N., Chowdhury, K., Pandey, V. N. & Modak, M. J. Valine of the YVDD motif of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase: role in the fidelity of DNA synthesis. Biochemistry 39, 5155–5165 (2000).
Google Scholar
Kaushik, N., Singh, K., Alluru, I. & Modak, M. J. Tyrosine 222, a member of the YXDD motif of MuLV RT, is catalytically essential and is a major component of the fidelity center. Biochemistry 38, 2617–2627 (1999).
Google Scholar
Doman, J. L. et al. Phage-assisted evolution and protein engineering yield compact, efficient prime editors. Cell 186, 3983–4002.e26 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jones, S. K. Jr et al. Massively parallel kinetic profiling of natural and engineered CRISPR nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 84–93 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shi, X. et al. Cas9 has no exonuclease activity resulting in staggered cleavage with overhangs and predictable di- and tri-nucleotide CRISPR insertions without template donor. Cell Discov. 5, 53 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hussmann, J. A. et al. Mapping the genetic landscape of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 184, 5653–5669.e25 (2021).
Google Scholar
Onn, L. et al. SIRT6 is a DNA double-strand break sensor. eLife 9, e51636 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chu, V. T. et al. Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR–Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 543–548 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rass, E. et al. Role of MRE11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 819–824 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sherman, B. T. et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W216–W221 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, L. et al. DEAD box 1 facilitates removal of RNA and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 2794–2810 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ulrich, H. D. Timing and spacing of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass. FEBS Lett. 585, 2861–2867 (2011).
Google Scholar
Taylor, M. S. et al. Affinity proteomics reveals human host factors implicated in discrete stages of LINE-1 retrotransposition. Cell 155, 1034–1048 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jiang, T., Zhang, X. O., Weng, Z. & Xue, W. Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 227–234 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zheng, C. et al. A flexible split prime editor using truncated reverse transcriptase improves dual-AAV delivery in mouse liver. Mol. Ther. 30, 1343–1351 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zong, Y. et al. An engineered prime editor with enhanced editing efficiency in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1394–1402 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bock, D. et al. In vivo prime editing of a metabolic liver disease in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabl9238 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zabrady, M., Zabrady, K., Li, A. W. H. & Doherty, A. J. Reverse transcriptases prime DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 7125–7142 (2023).
Google Scholar
Davis, J. R. et al. Efficient prime editing in mouse brain, liver and heart with dual AAVs. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 253–264 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee, J. et al. Prime editing with genuine Cas9 nickases minimizes unwanted indels. Nat. Commun. 14, 1786 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bebenek, K., Pedersen, L. C. & Kunkel, T. A. Structure–function studies of DNA polymerase lambda. Biochemistry 53, 2781–2792 (2014).
Google Scholar
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Google Scholar
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, B., et al. Targeted genome editing with a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase and exogenous DNA-containing templates. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1039–1045 (2023).
Zheng, C., Zhang, G., Dean, L., Sontheimer, E. & Xue, W. The reverse transcriptase domain of prime editors contributes to DNA repair in mammalian cells. NCBI BioProject https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1209104 (2025).
